If you can’t take the heat, get your orange snowflake ass out of the kitchen.

Donald Trump’s latest meltdown is a masterclass in logical fallacies and weak deflection tactics, but let’s start with the most obvious: his reliance on ad hominem attacks. He doesn’t engage with the actual content of the Signal story or Kristen Welker’s reporting. Instead, he resorts to calling them “Fake News” and accusing them of being part of a “Radical Left Witch Hunt.” This is a classic move by Trump—attack the messenger rather than address the message. If he can’t refute the facts, he tries to discredit the people delivering them. But here’s the thing: if you can dish out criticism and name-calling but can’t handle scrutiny yourself, you’re not a strong leader—you’re a pussy hiding behind bluster.

Next, Trump leans heavily on whataboutism, blaming Joe Biden for something that allegedly should have been done “YEARS AGO.” This tactic is nothing more than an attempt to redirect attention away from his own failures or controversies. Even if Biden had mishandled something in the past, that doesn’t absolve Trump or his allies from addressing current concerns. Whataboutism isn’t a defense—it’s a distraction, and anyone who uses it is essentially admitting they don’t have a real argument. If Trump truly believed this story was “old and boring,” he’d provide evidence to debunk it instead of relying on finger-pointing.

Finally, Trump’s boast about having the “most successful ‘First One Hundred Presidential Days’” is laughable and irrelevant to the topic at hand. This is an example of red herring, where he introduces an unrelated claim to steer the conversation away from uncomfortable truths. Success in one area (if true) doesn’t erase legitimate concerns in another. The fact that he ends with another attack on the media’s approval ratings shows just how desperate he is to avoid accountability.

If Trump wants to be taken seriously, he needs to stop hiding behind insults and distractions—and start addressing issues head-on like a real leader would. Otherwise, his critics are right: he can dish it out, but he can’t take it.